Welcome to TerraForums — a long-running carnivorous plant community established in 2001. Register for free to join the conversation, ask questions, and connect with growers from around the world.
So it has been the better part of three years since I received this plant.
I'm not sure if it is my husbandry skills or if it is the DNA in this plant, but as you can see it is not exactly all that much bigger than when I received it. Perhaps I have a miniature form of this cross, or perhaps I am good at growing bonsai Nepenthes.
I'm curious to see how other people's plants have been coming along.
I'm not sure if it is my husbandry skills or if it is the DNA in this plant, but as you can see it is not exactly all that much bigger than when I received it.
Its the nature of this cross - it doesn't get very big. I have two plants of it and neither has made a pitcher larger than 4.5 inches tall. I'm underwhelmed by it.
That cross with hamata red hairy looks great. Mine unfortunately shrunk down to half the size then made a basal and aborted the main growth point. Luckily i saw what was happening and removed the main growth and tried rooting it with what looks like some success and the basal is returning to the original size so im very happy with it.
I cant say that i find the cross with hamata to be very attractive. The teeth are not as well developed as i Thought but luckily the cross with the red hairy one looks fantastic
Its the nature of this cross - it doesn't get very big. I have two plants of it and neither has made a pitcher larger than 4.5 inches tall. I'm underwhelmed by it.
Well even your description as well as jurow's pics are significantly larger than my plant. My pitchers only stand two inches tall. I like small Nepenthes so I am not too upset. Maybe it needs a repot or a fertilize or something.
That N. singalana x RHH is certainly something else though!
Lets keep in mind as well that the so-called "red hairy hamata" is almost certainly a distinct species - we just need one of the taxonomists to say so. ;-) But the differences are obvious in how it behaves in breeding. (see above)
Lets keep in mind as well that the so-called "red hairy hamata" is almost certainly a distinct species - we just need one of the taxonomists to say so. ;-) But the differences are obvious in how it behaves in breeding. (see above)
Yes - interesting that none want to tackle what appears to be 'obvious'. It would appear to be much easier than trying to separate the various plants of SE Asia...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.