"North American Sarracenia Conservation Society" works fine for me. I like "North American" because it is specific. Not vague like "National" or, to a lesser extent, "US"
Anyway, this was all based around creating a NATIONAL (united states based) Sarracenia collection. Call me crazy, but I think that implies that all of the plants must be... well... in the United States. Are we excluding people of other nationalities than North America from participating in the project if we call ourselves a "North American" organization? It does not seem like it.
If a grower in... say... Antwerp, Belgium wants to contribute, I am sure he/she may contribute in many different ways.
Regardless, Casper has the right to use as many combinations of the suggested terms that have been provided, and weave them together to create a logical, appropriate name (duh, we all know this). I like his choices. Nice and diverse to a point.
I am sure that if enough people cite enough reasons for changing a word or a placement of a word (or a different name), he would listen.
*POSITIVE THINKING*
-Trevor