Heli
villosaholic
The problem with that is..those in power never go willingly!
Once you create a government, its hard to get rid of it..except by bloody revolution.
(has a National government ever peacefully dissolved? not that I can think of..)
just curious, what would make your system "good"? compared with the way the USSR, China and Cuba did it? I dont understand why that kind of Communism would be better..
(better than either USSR/China/Cuba communism, or better than Capitalism)
Scot
All those countries failed in communism. I wouldnt even count them as communist countries. The way Karl Marx said it is that you have to have the prolitariates over take the bourgeoisie (a revolution). This never happened and communism was just instated by the bourgeoisie in these countries so that they could just take advantage of the prolitariates. This system would be beneficial because everyone would be paid fair and equal sums of money and there would be no government that can take advantage of this system (like what these "communist" nations did) I have a lot more reasons but im tired