I have indeed been following this thread with interest. One of the reasons that I started my Photo Finder is to foster exactly this type of discussion and perhaps assist in sorting-out the chaos generated by buying or trading plants based on word-of-mouth naming, rather than taxonomic rigor. If you look carefully at the photos I have linked in the Finder, you will undoubtedly find hundreds, perhaps thousands, of links to plants that are incorrectly identified. Once such a photo is discovered, I suggest that the owner be contacted, with a cc to me. If I agree with the assessment, I will add a note in the Photo Finder until the photo is correctly labeled or withdrawn.[b said:Quote[/b] (LauraZ5 @ Mar. 20 2005,5:45)]Say PinguiculaMan and adnedarn, do either of you know how to notify the webmaster over at the Humboldt photo site that a few of the photos listed under 'John Rizzi' are incorrect?
I don't have a link to D. capensis x intermedia. What am I supposed to discover? Be a bit more specific.[b said:Quote[/b] (Treaqum @ Mar. 21 2005,5:36)]BTY Bob check you photo finder undre D. capensis x. intermedia or is it brevifolia.
[b said:Quote[/b] ]Yes, by all means, please explain the use of a double pot. Is this an experiment in Pinguicula culture or is it a proven method?