What's new
TerraForums Venus Flytrap, Nepenthes, Drosera and more talk

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Could someone spell out the

jimscott

Tropical Fish Enthusiast
LFS
peat
sand
perlite
vermiculite
pumice
orchid bark
 
This is a difficult one to repond to.  Here's an attempt:

LFS:
pro - great stuff for Sarrs and Neps
con - buying it encourages the destruction of sphagnum bogs
peat:
pro - good for plants wanting to grow in muck, but I don't have any
con - same as LFS, plus the fact it's a bad choice for most things it's sold for
sand:
pro - I don't use it, but it's great on a beach or in a sandbox.  If silica/flint/blasting sand, it's a good base for an artificial bog
con - awful in a swim suit
perlite:
pro - good for drainage and aeration and is very light weight stuff
con - none, if you want drainage and aeration and light weight
vermiculite:
pro - good for drainage and water retention
con - it can retain a deceptive amount of water
pumice:
Different people use that word for different things.  I consider it to be a lightweight, coarser version of perlite (sponge rock).
pro - like perlite, but even better.  My Sarrs and Neps live in a mix of LFS & sponge rock
cons - like perlite
orchid bark:
pros - sort of like pumice, but a little denser and won't float out of pots so easily
cons - decomposes.  Coconut husk chips (CHC) last much longer and retain more water.  A blend of CHC and sponge rock was the home of a very happy N. x Ventrata before I traded it a year ago.
 
Back
Top